|
FAA's ARC: Incentives Are Needed to Expedite ADS-B Equipage
The ADS-B Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC), a group of industry and government experts formed by the FAA
Administrator, believes that "some combination of financial incentives and
operational benefits will be needed to significantly accelerate ADS-B [automatic
dependent surveillance-broadcast] equipage before the compliance date of the
FAA's recently proposed rule."
The FAA's
NPRM (notice of proposed rulemaking) on ADS-B was released on October 5.
In its recently released
report, the ARC says it is "concerned
with the ability of the FAA to approve operational procedures that would provide
early operational benefits," and makes these recommendations - the first three
of which it describes as key:
-
Collaborate with the aviation
industry to aggressively develop an appropriate combination of financial
incentives and accelerated operational benefits.
-
Accelerate and prioritize the
identification of operations enabled by ADS-B, with approval of reduced
separation standards for initial operations with a high level of user benefits
by 2012.
-
Establish certification requirements
for aircraft displays for ADS-B-In applications by 2010.
-
Extend the coverage of the ADS-B
ground infrastructure to include high-value non-radar areas beyond those
currently identified.
-
Apply radar-like separation
standards for DO-260-equipped aircraft in the Gulf of Mexico area, and deploy an
ADS-B infrastructure south of the Gulf to facilitate ADS-B traffic feeds.
(The ARC noted that many transport category aircraft now have DO-260
transponders that will broadcast ADS-B if they have a position input. But in
some installations, this input comes from the flight management system, not GPS,
which makes their broadcast messages unusable for new ADS-B applications because
of insufficient accuracy and quality. In addition, various transponder
manufacturers interpreted 1090 ES (extended squitter) requirements differently,
resulting in inconsistent parameters being broadcast.)
-
Establish a mechanism to verify that
existing DO-260 installations are capable of being used to achieve early
operational benefits.
-
Collaborate with the aviation
industry to determine which non-ADS-B avionics can be replaced by ADS-B equipage
by 2010.
-
Provide preferred access to
additional capacity and efficiencies enabled by ADS-B equipage.
-
Leverage the benefits of ADS-B
information to incentivize equipage by establishing agreements with specific
operators.
Other Notable ADS-B Issues and Opportunities
In its report the ARC noted
these issues and opportunities that could affect equipage either positively or
negatively. Here is a summary:
-
The cost of retrofitting aircraft
that do not currently have ADS-B mandate compliant avionics is significant,
which means it may not be practical for some aircraft, especially those that
would be taken out of service before the compliance date of the proposed rule.
-
The FAA has yet to certify many
specific display packages for various functions and applications. Without a
clear understanding of what equipage will be suitable for performing specific
operations, it will be difficult for users to commit to equipage.
-
Certification of one or several
electronic flight bags (EFBs) might mitigate some uncertainty around needed
avionics – such as displays – however, certification is often a lengthy
process, and the necessary training for flight crews to use new equipment,
applications, and procedures can also delay the accrual of benefits. If these
processes can't be accelerated, decisions to equip become even more problematic.
-
The air transportation industry will
have to weigh the progress of ADS-B certification and application acceleration
projects, in addition to a normal assessment of costs and benefits. Significant
and quantifiable benefits will likely be required to justify the early equipage
of aircraft fleets, especially those fleets that may be retired before the
proposed compliance date.
-
Sharing ADS-B information with third
parties could be an early commercially valuable application. For example, if a
database of ADS-B position reports were compiled on operations for a
particular fleet of aircraft, that monitoring would provide a valuable analysis
tool for optimizing fleet management practices. The use of ADS-B analysis at
flight schools has already demonstrated that these sorts of ancillary databases
can be valuable for purposes not originally contemplated.
-
ADS-B-In applications that are
expected to provide the largest user benefits, and therefore motivate equipage,
include the following:
-
Advanced Surface Operations.
These would include high-speed runway turnoff guidance and low visibility taxi
capability to increase airport throughput in low visibility conditions to a
level equivalent with visual conditions.
-
Advanced Terminal
Applications. These would include airborne merging and
spacing aimed at providing airport throughput in low visibility conditions
equivalent to visual conditions, as well as improved operations in visual
conditions by reducing spacing. The use of aircraft intent information would
allow even more closely spaced terminal area routes, including departures and
arrivals using RNP (required navigation performance) capabilities, and parallel
approaches down to 700 feet centerline separation.
-
Advanced En Route and
Cruise. These include in-trail passing, use of
aircraft RNP capabilities, delegated separation, and aircraft-based separation
management, all of which could increase airspace throughput.
Specific Financial Incentives for Equipage
While operational benefits
will be important in motivating ADS-B equipage, the ARC believes that
operational benefits alone aren't enough to encourage voluntary equipage by
users, and some financial incentives will therefore be ecessary to encourage early
equipage. Here are some of its suggestions of financial incentives that
government could offer users:
-
Pay for the certification, purchase,
and installation of the equipment. Alaska's Capstone program relied on
government-purchased avionics equipment, which provided a base of airplanes with
installed equipment where quantifiable benefits could be validated.
-
Provide a grant for the equipment.
-
Provide an investment tax credit
specifically for ADS-B avionics.
-
Lower the effective excise tax rate
(either fuel or other mechanisms) for operators who elect to equip with ADS-B
avionics.
-
Provide research and development tax
credits to help offset the significant investments required of equipment
manufacturers and installers.
-
Reduce landing and overflight fees
for ADS-B-equipped aircraft.
-
Provide interest-free loans for equipage that are paid
back when benefits are accrued.
10-16-2007. |